https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195426 A subsequent complaint is not barred as a second FIR where it concerns distinct offences, different parties, and a separate transaction, because the bar applies only when the later information relates to the same occurrence or same cognizable offence. The text applies that principle to hold that allegations linked to the Ahmedabad branch were separate from earlier allegations concerning the Mumbai branch, so the later complaints were maintainable. It also states that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC are to be used sparingly and, absent exceptional grounds, should not be invoked to quash proceedings. On the facts, no basis was shown for interference with the refusal to quash or the order declining bail. en-us Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195426 A subsequent complaint is not barred as a second FIR where it concerns distinct offences, different parties, and a separate transaction, because the bar applies only when the later information relates to the same occurrence or same cognizable offence. The text applies that principle to hold that allegations linked to the Ahmedabad branch were separate from earlier allegations concerning the Mumbai branch, so the later complaints were maintainable. It also states that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC are to be used sparingly and, absent exceptional grounds, should not be invoked to quash proceedings. On the facts, no basis was shown for interference with the refusal to quash or the order declining bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195426