<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 647 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195426</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petitions challenging the ongoing investigations into economic crimes and the legality of multiple complaints, affirming that the complaints were independent and justified. It upheld the HC&#039;s application of Section 482 CrPC, and agreed with the HC&#039;s rejection of the bail application, denying relief to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 647 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195426</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petitions challenging the ongoing investigations into economic crimes and the legality of multiple complaints, affirming that the complaints were independent and justified. It upheld the HC&#039;s application of Section 482 CrPC, and agreed with the HC&#039;s rejection of the bail application, denying relief to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>