https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195424 Cut-off dates in the 2007 recognition regulations were upheld because they formed part of a time-bound scheme for scrutiny, consultation, inspection and timely grant of recognition, and they had a rational nexus with the statutory object; the Article 14 challenge failed. The statutory requirements under the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 and the Regulations, including consultation with the State Government or Union Territory Administration, were held mandatory because they served substantive regulatory purposes and could not be bypassed. Strict future compliance with the prescribed timetable and conditions was directed, while the operative relief already granted to the institutions was left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Oct 2017 18:12:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195424 Cut-off dates in the 2007 recognition regulations were upheld because they formed part of a time-bound scheme for scrutiny, consultation, inspection and timely grant of recognition, and they had a rational nexus with the statutory object; the Article 14 challenge failed. The statutory requirements under the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 and the Regulations, including consultation with the State Government or Union Territory Administration, were held mandatory because they served substantive regulatory purposes and could not be bypassed. Strict future compliance with the prescribed timetable and conditions was directed, while the operative relief already granted to the institutions was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195424