<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1245 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195422</link>
    <description>Tax demands arising from an assessment made after a company had already been ordered to be wound up did not acquire priority as crown debts. Such claims had to be dealt with under the winding-up framework in sections 529A and 530 of the Companies Act, 1956, and lodged with the Official Liquidator like other unsecured claims. Revenue entries based on the later assessment could not therefore be sustained and were required to be cancelled. The result was that the purchaser&#039;s title to the property in liquidation remained free from those adverse entries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 17:15:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1245 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195422</link>
      <description>Tax demands arising from an assessment made after a company had already been ordered to be wound up did not acquire priority as crown debts. Such claims had to be dealt with under the winding-up framework in sections 529A and 530 of the Companies Act, 1956, and lodged with the Official Liquidator like other unsecured claims. Revenue entries based on the later assessment could not therefore be sustained and were required to be cancelled. The result was that the purchaser&#039;s title to the property in liquidation remained free from those adverse entries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>