<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 784 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195420</link>
    <description>Continuous officiation by a promotee before the entry of direct recruits, followed by substantive regularisation without reversion, is treated as counting toward seniority in the parent cadre. The text also states that Fast Track Court service, having been directed to be treated as parent-cadre service, could not be disregarded by the service rules or the later administrative treatment, and was relevant for consequential selection grade. On procedural objections, the same-day filing after rejection of representation is presented as defeating delay and laches, and non-joinder is treated as immaterial where only the contested seniority adjustment between the concerned officers is in issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:05:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 784 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195420</link>
      <description>Continuous officiation by a promotee before the entry of direct recruits, followed by substantive regularisation without reversion, is treated as counting toward seniority in the parent cadre. The text also states that Fast Track Court service, having been directed to be treated as parent-cadre service, could not be disregarded by the service rules or the later administrative treatment, and was relevant for consequential selection grade. On procedural objections, the same-day filing after rejection of representation is presented as defeating delay and laches, and non-joinder is treated as immaterial where only the contested seniority adjustment between the concerned officers is in issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>