https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195415 The court dismissed the application for a writ of mandamus seeking a dealership, as the petitioner was deemed ineligible for equitable relief due to conduct issues. The court upheld the legality of the dealership granted to another individual, finding the Oil Selection Board's decision fair and procedurally sound. The petitioner's claims of arbitrary decision-making, irrelevant marks, and promissory estoppel were rejected. Judicial review under Article 226 was considered, but no grounds for interference were found. The petitioner's conduct, including false accusations and participation in the selection process, precluded equity considerations in his favor. en-us Thu, 16 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:58:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195415 The court dismissed the application for a writ of mandamus seeking a dealership, as the petitioner was deemed ineligible for equitable relief due to conduct issues. The court upheld the legality of the dealership granted to another individual, finding the Oil Selection Board's decision fair and procedurally sound. The petitioner's claims of arbitrary decision-making, irrelevant marks, and promissory estoppel were rejected. Judicial review under Article 226 was considered, but no grounds for interference were found. The petitioner's conduct, including false accusations and participation in the selection process, precluded equity considerations in his favor. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195415