https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195413 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment in a case concerning the application of a compassionate appointment scheme in Haryana. The respondent, initially appointed as a Clerk, sought higher positions as a Teacher and Sub-Inspector, leading to a writ petition alleging discrimination. The High Court directed the respondent's appointment as an Inspector, which the Supreme Court overturned. Emphasizing the limited scope of judicial review in mandamus petitions, the Court remitted the matter for fresh consideration, highlighting the importance of decision-making processes within legal boundaries. The appeal was allowed with no costs awarded. en-us Tue, 17 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195413 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment in a case concerning the application of a compassionate appointment scheme in Haryana. The respondent, initially appointed as a Clerk, sought higher positions as a Teacher and Sub-Inspector, leading to a writ petition alleging discrimination. The High Court directed the respondent's appointment as an Inspector, which the Supreme Court overturned. Emphasizing the limited scope of judicial review in mandamus petitions, the Court remitted the matter for fresh consideration, highlighting the importance of decision-making processes within legal boundaries. The appeal was allowed with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195413