<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 48 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10377</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of a penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for concealment of income due to a bona fide mistake in accounting. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the omission of the value of rejected goods from closing stock was inadvertent and not indicative of mala fide intent. Emphasizing that not every accounting error warrants penalty imposition, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the decision to delete the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 48 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10377</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of a penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for concealment of income due to a bona fide mistake in accounting. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the omission of the value of rejected goods from closing stock was inadvertent and not indicative of mala fide intent. Emphasizing that not every accounting error warrants penalty imposition, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the decision to delete the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>