<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1212 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350057</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of adding Rs. 1.5 Crore back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, directing a comprehensive enquiry into the facts. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the additions of Rs. 9,00,000/- and Rs. 4,02,07,541/-, emphasizing the importance of thorough investigation and procedural compliance in the adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:32:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1212 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350057</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of adding Rs. 1.5 Crore back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, directing a comprehensive enquiry into the facts. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the additions of Rs. 9,00,000/- and Rs. 4,02,07,541/-, emphasizing the importance of thorough investigation and procedural compliance in the adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>