<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1207 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350052</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the allowability of the deduction under section 80IAB for the assessee and rejecting the AO&#039;s treatment of the income from the transfer of bare shell buildings as capital gains. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the principle of consistency in judicial decisions regarding tax deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:32:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1207 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350052</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming the allowability of the deduction under section 80IAB for the assessee and rejecting the AO&#039;s treatment of the income from the transfer of bare shell buildings as capital gains. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the principle of consistency in judicial decisions regarding tax deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>