https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350043 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation and duty demand for seized goods, confirmed customs duty and penalties based on separate show cause notices, justified the issuance of multiple notices for the same period, held the appellant vicariously liable for employee actions, upheld the valuation methodology for customs duty, and classified Duty Free Shops as bonded warehouses. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's appeals and upheld the original orders dated 21.08.2012 and 17.05.2013, pronouncing its decision on 12.09.2017. en-us Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2019 12:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350043 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation and duty demand for seized goods, confirmed customs duty and penalties based on separate show cause notices, justified the issuance of multiple notices for the same period, held the appellant vicariously liable for employee actions, upheld the valuation methodology for customs duty, and classified Duty Free Shops as bonded warehouses. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's appeals and upheld the original orders dated 21.08.2012 and 17.05.2013, pronouncing its decision on 12.09.2017. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350043