<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1197 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350042</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to the presence of prime HR sheets in the re-rollable scrap but reduced the redemption fine and penalty. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the quantum of the fine and penalty was partially successful as the tribunal found insufficient evidence linking the appellant to the intentional inclusion of the prime quality sheets. Overall, the appeal was rejected except for the adjustments made to the redemption fine and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1197 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350042</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to the presence of prime HR sheets in the re-rollable scrap but reduced the redemption fine and penalty. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the quantum of the fine and penalty was partially successful as the tribunal found insufficient evidence linking the appellant to the intentional inclusion of the prime quality sheets. Overall, the appeal was rejected except for the adjustments made to the redemption fine and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>