<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1191 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350036</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with the contestation of penalty enhancements under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the penalty impositions, ensuring that the penalties were rational, legal, and in accordance with the provisions of the law. The penalty enhancement under Section 77 was deemed unreasonable and set aside, emphasizing the importance of proportionality in penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:31:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1191 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350036</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with the contestation of penalty enhancements under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the penalty impositions, ensuring that the penalties were rational, legal, and in accordance with the provisions of the law. The penalty enhancement under Section 77 was deemed unreasonable and set aside, emphasizing the importance of proportionality in penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>