https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350025 The Tribunal allowed the Appeals by way of remand for further review, directing both parties to collect crucial documents, likely in the custody of the preventive unit of the department, for a fresh decision considering the relevant invoices/evidences. The denial of credit on returned/rejected goods was due to lack of appropriate documents and correlation between goods received and cleared, with the Tribunal noting that the relevant documents were seized and not returned to the Appellant, indicating they were still with the Department. en-us Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:30:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350025 The Tribunal allowed the Appeals by way of remand for further review, directing both parties to collect crucial documents, likely in the custody of the preventive unit of the department, for a fresh decision considering the relevant invoices/evidences. The denial of credit on returned/rejected goods was due to lack of appropriate documents and correlation between goods received and cleared, with the Tribunal noting that the relevant documents were seized and not returned to the Appellant, indicating they were still with the Department. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350025