<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1174 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350019</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for differential excise duty. The decision was based on the analysis of relevant rules, precedents, and clarifications, finding no merit in the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:30:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1174 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350019</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for differential excise duty. The decision was based on the analysis of relevant rules, precedents, and clarifications, finding no merit in the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>