<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1169 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350014</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging assessment orders for the years 2002-2003 and 2005-2006 related to a dyeing works contract. The petitioner&#039;s attempt to reopen a settled issue on the taxation of chemicals was rejected, emphasizing the transfer of property of goods like chemicals attracts sales tax. While the Supreme Court granted liberty for additional queries, the court clarified that unless a decision favored the dealer on those grounds, challenging the impugned orders was not permissible. The petitioner&#039;s indirect challenge to a settled decision was deemed impermissible, leading to the dismissal of the writ petitions with liberty to file appeals against the orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1169 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350014</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging assessment orders for the years 2002-2003 and 2005-2006 related to a dyeing works contract. The petitioner&#039;s attempt to reopen a settled issue on the taxation of chemicals was rejected, emphasizing the transfer of property of goods like chemicals attracts sales tax. While the Supreme Court granted liberty for additional queries, the court clarified that unless a decision favored the dealer on those grounds, challenging the impugned orders was not permissible. The petitioner&#039;s indirect challenge to a settled decision was deemed impermissible, leading to the dismissal of the writ petitions with liberty to file appeals against the orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>