<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1118 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195409</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) confirming that the goods were exempt from VAT was upheld. Reimbursement of additional duty of Customs was denied due to lack of evidence of VAT payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1118 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195409</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) confirming that the goods were exempt from VAT was upheld. Reimbursement of additional duty of Customs was denied due to lack of evidence of VAT payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>