<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1720 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195411</link>
    <description>A departmental inquiry will not be vitiated where the employee receives a charge-sheet, files a reply, and is given a fair chance to lead evidence and cross-examine witnesses; on those facts, no breach of natural justice was established and the penalty of compulsory retirement was not interfered with because it was not shown to be wholly unreasonable or shockingly disproportionate. Separately, an unduly prolonged suspension may be counted for pension where the delay in concluding the disciplinary proceedings is not wholly attributable to the employee; on that basis, the suspension period was directed to be included for pensionary benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1720 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195411</link>
      <description>A departmental inquiry will not be vitiated where the employee receives a charge-sheet, files a reply, and is given a fair chance to lead evidence and cross-examine witnesses; on those facts, no breach of natural justice was established and the penalty of compulsory retirement was not interfered with because it was not shown to be wholly unreasonable or shockingly disproportionate. Separately, an unduly prolonged suspension may be counted for pension where the delay in concluding the disciplinary proceedings is not wholly attributable to the employee; on that basis, the suspension period was directed to be included for pensionary benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>