<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1209 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195407</link>
    <description>An un-stayed appellate order passed in a tax assessment binds the assessing authority, and the original demand cannot be revived merely because further appeals are pending. Under the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax (Settlement of Arrears) Act, 2010, settlement applications had to be examined on the basis of the demand as revised by the appellate authority, not the superseded assessment order. Rejection on the contrary basis was unsustainable because revenue authorities must follow appellate orders in judicial discipline. The impugned rejection was set aside and the applications were directed to be reconsidered under the settlement scheme on the correct legal basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2017 18:56:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1209 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195407</link>
      <description>An un-stayed appellate order passed in a tax assessment binds the assessing authority, and the original demand cannot be revived merely because further appeals are pending. Under the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax (Settlement of Arrears) Act, 2010, settlement applications had to be examined on the basis of the demand as revised by the appellate authority, not the superseded assessment order. Rejection on the contrary basis was unsustainable because revenue authorities must follow appellate orders in judicial discipline. The impugned rejection was set aside and the applications were directed to be reconsidered under the settlement scheme on the correct legal basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>