https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195403 The High Court directed that the trial court record be summoned by special messenger, impleaded the State as respondent, and required the petitioner to furnish copies to the opposite side, with the matter re-notified for further hearing. It also allowed exemption from filing certified copies in the listed application and disposed of that application. The petitioner's objections regarding admissibility of electronic records under Section 65B, the alleged applicability of Sections 292/293 IPC, and claimed protection under Section 79 of the IT Act were recorded but not finally decided, as those issues were left open for examination on the trial court record. en-us Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Oct 2017 16:01:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195403 The High Court directed that the trial court record be summoned by special messenger, impleaded the State as respondent, and required the petitioner to furnish copies to the opposite side, with the matter re-notified for further hearing. It also allowed exemption from filing certified copies in the listed application and disposed of that application. The petitioner's objections regarding admissibility of electronic records under Section 65B, the alleged applicability of Sections 292/293 IPC, and claimed protection under Section 79 of the IT Act were recorded but not finally decided, as those issues were left open for examination on the trial court record. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195403