<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 685 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195401</link>
    <description>Compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 was not made within the time ordered by the Tribunal, so the appeals were dismissed for non-compliance. The operative point is that, where the prescribed pre-deposit is not fulfilled, the Tribunal may decline to entertain the appeal until the statutory requirement is satisfied. The order records absence of compliance with the earlier pre-deposit direction and treats that default as sufficient ground for dismissal of the pending customs appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2017 15:00:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 685 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195401</link>
      <description>Compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 was not made within the time ordered by the Tribunal, so the appeals were dismissed for non-compliance. The operative point is that, where the prescribed pre-deposit is not fulfilled, the Tribunal may decline to entertain the appeal until the statutory requirement is satisfied. The order records absence of compliance with the earlier pre-deposit direction and treats that default as sufficient ground for dismissal of the pending customs appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>