<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1247 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195399</link>
    <description>Section 125 CrPC maintenance proceedings are treated as quasi-civil and quasi-criminal social welfare remedies, so a formal amendment may be allowed even without an express enabling provision if it cures a simple defect and causes no prejudice. An amendment that does not alter the nature or character of the proceeding, and that merely corrects particulars such as dates or related factual , is permissible. On the stated facts, the proposed changes to the date of marriage, the child&#039;s date of birth, and property particulars were held not to change the essential character of the maintenance claim, and the amendment petition was therefore maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2017 12:59:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1247 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195399</link>
      <description>Section 125 CrPC maintenance proceedings are treated as quasi-civil and quasi-criminal social welfare remedies, so a formal amendment may be allowed even without an express enabling provision if it cures a simple defect and causes no prejudice. An amendment that does not alter the nature or character of the proceeding, and that merely corrects particulars such as dates or related factual , is permissible. On the stated facts, the proposed changes to the date of marriage, the child&#039;s date of birth, and property particulars were held not to change the essential character of the maintenance claim, and the amendment petition was therefore maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>