https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195394 Family settlements recorded in a compromise decree were treated as final adjustments of disputed property rights, with later non-payment of agreed sums operating as a breach of personal payment obligations rather than a ground to rescind the transfer. The compromise was regarded as supported by written settlements and affidavits under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, while objections based on lack of registration and non-impleadment of an assignee were rejected in light of the nature of the family arrangement and the parties' conduct. Allegations of fraud and procedural irregularity were found unsupported by the record and insufficient to unsettle the decree. en-us Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195394 Family settlements recorded in a compromise decree were treated as final adjustments of disputed property rights, with later non-payment of agreed sums operating as a breach of personal payment obligations rather than a ground to rescind the transfer. The compromise was regarded as supported by written settlements and affidavits under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, while objections based on lack of registration and non-impleadment of an assignee were rejected in light of the nature of the family arrangement and the parties' conduct. Allegations of fraud and procedural irregularity were found unsupported by the record and insufficient to unsettle the decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195394