https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195393 A compromise decree for eviction under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act was upheld where the record, including the plaint and compromise petition, showed expressly or by necessary implication that the tenant was liable to eviction and the compromise was not contrary to the statute. The court recording the compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC was not required to recite an express satisfaction in so many words; such satisfaction is presumed unless rebutted. On the admitted arrears, mesne profits, and electric charges, and the absence of any genuine dispute on standard rent or fixation proceedings, the tenant was treated as having impliedly admitted liability under section 12(3)(b), and the decree was executable. en-us Thu, 23 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Oct 2017 11:45:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195393 A compromise decree for eviction under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act was upheld where the record, including the plaint and compromise petition, showed expressly or by necessary implication that the tenant was liable to eviction and the compromise was not contrary to the statute. The court recording the compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC was not required to recite an express satisfaction in so many words; such satisfaction is presumed unless rebutted. On the admitted arrears, mesne profits, and electric charges, and the absence of any genuine dispute on standard rent or fixation proceedings, the tenant was treated as having impliedly admitted liability under section 12(3)(b), and the decree was executable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195393