<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1164 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350009</link>
    <description>Tax liability based on third-party material cannot be sustained where the assessing authority fails to secure that dealer&#039;s effective presence for cross-examination under Section 54 despite a binding direction to do so. Mere issuance of summons is insufficient if the authority does not ensure attendance, and in the absence of cross-examination the materials obtained from that dealer cannot be used against the assessee. A further remand was held to serve no purpose, and the assessment orders were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1164 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350009</link>
      <description>Tax liability based on third-party material cannot be sustained where the assessing authority fails to secure that dealer&#039;s effective presence for cross-examination under Section 54 despite a binding direction to do so. Mere issuance of summons is insufficient if the authority does not ensure attendance, and in the absence of cross-examination the materials obtained from that dealer cannot be used against the assessee. A further remand was held to serve no purpose, and the assessment orders were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>