<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1471 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195381</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the writ petitions challenging assessment orders under the TNVAT Act for 2012-2013 and 2014-2015. The court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s failure to provide satisfactory explanations for not objecting to the pre-assessment notice and not pursuing appellate remedies. Despite the petitioner&#039;s arguments, the court ruled that without proper justifications for these lapses, the petitions could not be entertained. The judgment underscored the importance of adhering to procedural rules and effectively defending legal proceedings. Consequently, the writ petitions were deemed not maintainable, with the petitioner advised to explore available remedies under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2017 10:09:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1471 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195381</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the writ petitions challenging assessment orders under the TNVAT Act for 2012-2013 and 2014-2015. The court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s failure to provide satisfactory explanations for not objecting to the pre-assessment notice and not pursuing appellate remedies. Despite the petitioner&#039;s arguments, the court ruled that without proper justifications for these lapses, the petitions could not be entertained. The judgment underscored the importance of adhering to procedural rules and effectively defending legal proceedings. Consequently, the writ petitions were deemed not maintainable, with the petitioner advised to explore available remedies under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>