<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1469 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195368</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and Cross Objections by the assessees. It allowed the set-off of long-term capital loss against long-term capital gain and deleted the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the transactions were legitimate tax planning within the framework of the law, not constituting tax evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2017 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1469 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195368</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and Cross Objections by the assessees. It allowed the set-off of long-term capital loss against long-term capital gain and deleted the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the transactions were legitimate tax planning within the framework of the law, not constituting tax evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>