https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195385 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a service tax demand order of ? 5,41,01,083, stating it was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternate remedy before CESTAT. The petitioner's arguments on the construction of residential complex and the limitation period for the show cause notice were deemed factual issues. The court advised pursuing the appeal route and closed the case without awarding costs. en-us Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 13:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195385 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a service tax demand order of ? 5,41,01,083, stating it was not maintainable due to the availability of an alternate remedy before CESTAT. The petitioner's arguments on the construction of residential complex and the limitation period for the show cause notice were deemed factual issues. The court advised pursuing the appeal route and closed the case without awarding costs. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195385