<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1636 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside Order-in-Original No.07/Commissioner//LKO/CX/2009 in an appeal by the Appellant-assessee regarding procurement of raw materials from M/s M.K. Steels Pvt. Ltd. Allegations of issuing same invoices from Kolkata were addressed, with the Court noting the bona fide nature of the purchase and diligence in dealings. Both parties agreed the issue was covered by previous decisions. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, allowing both appeals and granting consequential relief to the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2017 10:09:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1636 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside Order-in-Original No.07/Commissioner//LKO/CX/2009 in an appeal by the Appellant-assessee regarding procurement of raw materials from M/s M.K. Steels Pvt. Ltd. Allegations of issuing same invoices from Kolkata were addressed, with the Court noting the bona fide nature of the purchase and diligence in dealings. Both parties agreed the issue was covered by previous decisions. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, allowing both appeals and granting consequential relief to the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>