<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1449 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195372</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the treatment of excess application of income, directing the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The ITAT also dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the carry forward of long-term capital loss. The issue of the validity of reopening the assessment was not adjudicated due to the deletion of the additions, rendering it academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2017 10:09:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1449 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195372</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the treatment of excess application of income, directing the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The ITAT also dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the carry forward of long-term capital loss. The issue of the validity of reopening the assessment was not adjudicated due to the deletion of the additions, rendering it academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>