<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1143 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349988</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, granting exemption of capital gains under Section 54F for the assessment year 2013-14. Despite not depositing the funds in the capital gains account scheme as required, the tribunal considered the deposit in a term deposit account a technical defect, not a violation. The investment timeline met the requirements under Section 54, emphasizing the liberal construction of beneficial provisions to encourage house construction. The use of a term deposit account for capital gains was deemed compliant, and joint ownership of the new property did not affect eligibility for exemption under Section 54.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2017 08:18:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1143 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349988</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, granting exemption of capital gains under Section 54F for the assessment year 2013-14. Despite not depositing the funds in the capital gains account scheme as required, the tribunal considered the deposit in a term deposit account a technical defect, not a violation. The investment timeline met the requirements under Section 54, emphasizing the liberal construction of beneficial provisions to encourage house construction. The use of a term deposit account for capital gains was deemed compliant, and joint ownership of the new property did not affect eligibility for exemption under Section 54.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>