<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1132 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349977</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the petition under Sections 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956, as the petitioners failed to challenge a past concluded transaction in a timely manner, had alternative remedies available, and did not establish grounds for winding up the company on just and equitable grounds. Both parties were found to have withheld relevant information, leading to the lack of entitlement to relief under the mentioned sections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2017 08:17:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1132 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349977</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the petition under Sections 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956, as the petitioners failed to challenge a past concluded transaction in a timely manner, had alternative remedies available, and did not establish grounds for winding up the company on just and equitable grounds. Both parties were found to have withheld relevant information, leading to the lack of entitlement to relief under the mentioned sections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>