<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1131 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349976</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency resolution process against the respondent corporate debtor due to the applicant&#039;s failure to comply with the mandatory requirement of filing a certificate from financial institutions confirming the absence of payment of unpaid operational debt by the debtor, as per Section 9(3)(c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Despite the opportunity to rectify the deficiency, the applicant did not submit the required certificate within the specified timeframe. The Tribunal emphasized strict compliance with statutory provisions and upheld the rejection based on the incomplete application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1131 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349976</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency resolution process against the respondent corporate debtor due to the applicant&#039;s failure to comply with the mandatory requirement of filing a certificate from financial institutions confirming the absence of payment of unpaid operational debt by the debtor, as per Section 9(3)(c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Despite the opportunity to rectify the deficiency, the applicant did not submit the required certificate within the specified timeframe. The Tribunal emphasized strict compliance with statutory provisions and upheld the rejection based on the incomplete application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>