https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349975 The appellate tribunal clarified that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to compound offenses under Section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013, for violations involving fines, even if imprisonment is a possible penalty, as long as no case is pending before the Special Court. The Tribunal was directed to assess penalties after obtaining a report from the Registrar of Companies and notifying the parties. The case was remitted back to the Tribunal for a decision on penalties for the company and its officers for alleged violations of Sections 92, 137, 96, and 129 of the Companies Act, 2013. en-us Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Oct 2017 08:17:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349975 The appellate tribunal clarified that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to compound offenses under Section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013, for violations involving fines, even if imprisonment is a possible penalty, as long as no case is pending before the Special Court. The Tribunal was directed to assess penalties after obtaining a report from the Registrar of Companies and notifying the parties. The case was remitted back to the Tribunal for a decision on penalties for the company and its officers for alleged violations of Sections 92, 137, 96, and 129 of the Companies Act, 2013. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349975