https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349963 The Tribunal confirmed the demand for duty on alleged clandestine removal of finished goods and raw material based on discrepancies in stock levels, particularly with plastic pipes, despite stock taking being done on an eye estimation basis. The appellant's argument that the allegations were unsustainable was rejected, and duty was imposed along with a penalty for the proved shortages. However, for other goods where shortages were not proven due to the eye estimation basis, the demands were set aside, resulting in a partial disposal of the appeal. en-us Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Oct 2017 08:16:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349963 The Tribunal confirmed the demand for duty on alleged clandestine removal of finished goods and raw material based on discrepancies in stock levels, particularly with plastic pipes, despite stock taking being done on an eye estimation basis. The appellant's argument that the allegations were unsustainable was rejected, and duty was imposed along with a penalty for the proved shortages. However, for other goods where shortages were not proven due to the eye estimation basis, the demands were set aside, resulting in a partial disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349963