<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1112 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349957</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that freight charges from the factory gate to the buyer&#039;s premises should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty calculation. It was determined that the goods were sold at the factory gate, and as per Section 4(1)(a) and Rule 5, transportation costs to the buyer&#039;s premises should be excluded. The Tribunal set aside the previous order-in-Appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1112 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349957</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that freight charges from the factory gate to the buyer&#039;s premises should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty calculation. It was determined that the goods were sold at the factory gate, and as per Section 4(1)(a) and Rule 5, transportation costs to the buyer&#039;s premises should be excluded. The Tribunal set aside the previous order-in-Appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>