<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1110 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349955</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside the demand for Central Excise duty of Rs. 2.98 crore, along with penalties, while upholding the disallowance of Cenvat credit and penalties related to unverified returns. The penalty of Rs. 1.22 crore imposed on the CEO of the dealer company was set aside due to insufficient evidence of his involvement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1110 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349955</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside the demand for Central Excise duty of Rs. 2.98 crore, along with penalties, while upholding the disallowance of Cenvat credit and penalties related to unverified returns. The penalty of Rs. 1.22 crore imposed on the CEO of the dealer company was set aside due to insufficient evidence of his involvement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>