<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1104 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349949</link>
    <description>Products containing cereals together with oils, spices and salt were held classifiable as extruded or expanded savoury or salted products under Sub-heading 19059030, because Heading 1904 applies only where goods are obtained exclusively by swelling or roasting of cereals or cereal products. The manufacturing process, which involved blending, extrusion, drying, seasoning and packing, showed that extrusion was the dominant process rather than cereal swelling or roasting. Reliance on the tariff scheme, HSN Explanatory Notes and earlier decisions supported this classification, so the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed and the classification under Heading 1904 did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2017 08:15:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1104 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349949</link>
      <description>Products containing cereals together with oils, spices and salt were held classifiable as extruded or expanded savoury or salted products under Sub-heading 19059030, because Heading 1904 applies only where goods are obtained exclusively by swelling or roasting of cereals or cereal products. The manufacturing process, which involved blending, extrusion, drying, seasoning and packing, showed that extrusion was the dominant process rather than cereal swelling or roasting. Reliance on the tariff scheme, HSN Explanatory Notes and earlier decisions supported this classification, so the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed and the classification under Heading 1904 did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>