<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 625 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195362</link>
    <description>A cooperative statute may treat an apartment in a multi-storied building as heritable and transferable immovable property, so a deceased member&#039;s interest can devolve on legal heirs where no nominee exists. The society&#039;s role is then to process transfer of that interest under the statutory procedure, rather than treat the matter as a fresh admission to membership. The text also states that action by a Special Officer exercising statutory powers can be challenged in writ jurisdiction when civil rights are affected and the decision is alleged to be arbitrary or illegal. It further notes that re-allotment on the ground of delay in naming a single heir was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:15:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 625 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195362</link>
      <description>A cooperative statute may treat an apartment in a multi-storied building as heritable and transferable immovable property, so a deceased member&#039;s interest can devolve on legal heirs where no nominee exists. The society&#039;s role is then to process transfer of that interest under the statutory procedure, rather than treat the matter as a fresh admission to membership. The text also states that action by a Special Officer exercising statutory powers can be challenged in writ jurisdiction when civil rights are affected and the decision is alleged to be arbitrary or illegal. It further notes that re-allotment on the ground of delay in naming a single heir was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>