https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195355 The Supreme Court overturned the Deputy Commissioner's decision to set aside an arbitration award involving a construction contract. The Court found that the arbitrator did not violate natural justice or exceed jurisdiction, and the misconduct allegations were baseless. The High Court's failure to address jurisdiction and limitation issues was noted, with the Supreme Court ruling that the arbitrator's decision fell within the contract's scope. The limitation defense raised by the Union was rejected, and the appellants' claim was deemed valid, leading to the appeal being allowed with costs awarded to the appellants. en-us Fri, 13 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:40:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195355 The Supreme Court overturned the Deputy Commissioner's decision to set aside an arbitration award involving a construction contract. The Court found that the arbitrator did not violate natural justice or exceed jurisdiction, and the misconduct allegations were baseless. The High Court's failure to address jurisdiction and limitation issues was noted, with the Supreme Court ruling that the arbitrator's decision fell within the contract's scope. The limitation defense raised by the Union was rejected, and the appellants' claim was deemed valid, leading to the appeal being allowed with costs awarded to the appellants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195355