https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195355 An arbitral award could not be set aside for breach of natural justice or misconduct where the party was given time to file written arguments, sought no further extension, and simply failed to comply. A broadly worded arbitration clause covered claims for interest on contractual dues, so the arbitrator did not exceed jurisdiction by awarding interest. The limitation objection also failed because arbitration was treated as commenced on service of the notice seeking reference, the demand was made within three years of the relevant events, and the objection had not been consistently pressed earlier. The award was therefore restored and the substantive objections were rejected. en-us Fri, 13 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:40:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195355 An arbitral award could not be set aside for breach of natural justice or misconduct where the party was given time to file written arguments, sought no further extension, and simply failed to comply. A broadly worded arbitration clause covered claims for interest on contractual dues, so the arbitrator did not exceed jurisdiction by awarding interest. The limitation objection also failed because arbitration was treated as commenced on service of the notice seeking reference, the demand was made within three years of the relevant events, and the objection had not been consistently pressed earlier. The award was therefore restored and the substantive objections were rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Feb 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195355