<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1329 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195353</link>
    <description>An express contractual bar on interest prevented the arbitral tribunal from awarding pre-award interest under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because parties had agreed otherwise; the High Court was correct in setting aside that part of the award. For post-award interest, Section 31(7)(b) supplies the statutory default rate unless the award otherwise directs, and the rate fixed by the arbitrator could not be reduced without justification; the lower court&#039;s reduction to 6% was unsustainable. The Supreme Court therefore sustained the bar on pre-award interest but restored the arbitrator&#039;s post-award interest rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1329 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195353</link>
      <description>An express contractual bar on interest prevented the arbitral tribunal from awarding pre-award interest under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because parties had agreed otherwise; the High Court was correct in setting aside that part of the award. For post-award interest, Section 31(7)(b) supplies the statutory default rate unless the award otherwise directs, and the rate fixed by the arbitrator could not be reduced without justification; the lower court&#039;s reduction to 6% was unsustainable. The Supreme Court therefore sustained the bar on pre-award interest but restored the arbitrator&#039;s post-award interest rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>