<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 48 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10349</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the sufficiency of evidence provided to the Assessing Officer, the lack of errors in the assessment order, and the absence of substantial legal questions. The judgment highlighted the importance of thorough investigations and the need for justifying any re-examinations or fresh assessments under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 48 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10349</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the sufficiency of evidence provided to the Assessing Officer, the lack of errors in the assessment order, and the absence of substantial legal questions. The judgment highlighted the importance of thorough investigations and the need for justifying any re-examinations or fresh assessments under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>