<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1090 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349935</link>
    <description>A digital advertising distribution arrangement was analysed under the royalty provisions of section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and Article 12 of the India-Ireland DTAA. The payment was treated as royalty because the platform use involved trademark and brand features, access to customer data, and embedded processes and know-how, rather than a simple purchase of advertising space. The discussion also notes that proceedings under section 201 were considered within a reasonable limitation period for non-resident payees, and that withholding under section 195 follows chargeability on accrual, not a unilateral receipt-based view, absent an application under section 195(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:06:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1090 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349935</link>
      <description>A digital advertising distribution arrangement was analysed under the royalty provisions of section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and Article 12 of the India-Ireland DTAA. The payment was treated as royalty because the platform use involved trademark and brand features, access to customer data, and embedded processes and know-how, rather than a simple purchase of advertising space. The discussion also notes that proceedings under section 201 were considered within a reasonable limitation period for non-resident payees, and that withholding under section 195 follows chargeability on accrual, not a unilateral receipt-based view, absent an application under section 195(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>