https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349919 The court ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the goods imported did not fall under the category subject to anti-dumping duty investigation. The imposition of anti-dumping duty was deemed unjustified due to a misconception of the law and the lack of evidence supporting the levy. The appellant's right to challenge the adjudication order and raise legal questions at any stage of the proceedings was upheld, leading to the allowance of both appeals. en-us Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349919 The court ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the goods imported did not fall under the category subject to anti-dumping duty investigation. The imposition of anti-dumping duty was deemed unjustified due to a misconception of the law and the lack of evidence supporting the levy. The appellant's right to challenge the adjudication order and raise legal questions at any stage of the proceedings was upheld, leading to the allowance of both appeals. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349919