https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349907 Where the RFP was silent on the bid-comparison method, the Delhi HC held that the procuring authority could adopt a reasonable cost-to-user evaluation framework, including taxes and duties, and it refused to interfere with the treatment of customs duty as part of the bid. The petitioner's attempt to reopen bid computation after opening was rejected. Applying the limited scope of judicial review in tender matters, the Court also upheld the declaration of the second respondent as L1 because the comparative assessment was conducted uniformly and no mala fides, arbitrariness, irrationality, or perversity was shown. The writ petition was therefore found to lack merit. en-us Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349907 Where the RFP was silent on the bid-comparison method, the Delhi HC held that the procuring authority could adopt a reasonable cost-to-user evaluation framework, including taxes and duties, and it refused to interfere with the treatment of customs duty as part of the bid. The petitioner's attempt to reopen bid computation after opening was rejected. Applying the limited scope of judicial review in tender matters, the Court also upheld the declaration of the second respondent as L1 because the comparative assessment was conducted uniformly and no mala fides, arbitrariness, irrationality, or perversity was shown. The writ petition was therefore found to lack merit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349907