<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1058 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order denying the refund claim under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for export of services. The Tribunal held that since there was no dispute at the time of availing the credit, the refund claim cannot be denied based on later disputes regarding the nature of the services. The appellant&#039;s refund claim was allowed, and the appeal was granted with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:04:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1058 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order denying the refund claim under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for export of services. The Tribunal held that since there was no dispute at the time of availing the credit, the refund claim cannot be denied based on later disputes regarding the nature of the services. The appellant&#039;s refund claim was allowed, and the appeal was granted with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>