<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1045 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349890</link>
    <description>Prior departmental knowledge of the assessee&#039;s crossing of the SSI exemption limit, gained through the search and scrutiny on 10.06.2006, defeated the allegation of suppression with intent to evade duty. As the extended period of limitation could not be invoked, the duty demand was time-barred. The penalties, being consequential to the unsustainable demand, also could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:04:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1045 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349890</link>
      <description>Prior departmental knowledge of the assessee&#039;s crossing of the SSI exemption limit, gained through the search and scrutiny on 10.06.2006, defeated the allegation of suppression with intent to evade duty. As the extended period of limitation could not be invoked, the duty demand was time-barred. The penalties, being consequential to the unsustainable demand, also could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>