<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1042 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349887</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the reversal of Cenvat credit on a proportionate basis for input/input services used in final exempted goods was not necessary as the appellant had already availed proportionate credit for dutiable goods. The admissibility issue of Cenvat credit availed on invoices in the name of another unit was rectified by the appellant without malicious intent, leading to no penalty imposition. Consequently, the Tribunal found no grounds for penalty imposition and disposed of the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:04:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1042 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349887</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the reversal of Cenvat credit on a proportionate basis for input/input services used in final exempted goods was not necessary as the appellant had already availed proportionate credit for dutiable goods. The admissibility issue of Cenvat credit availed on invoices in the name of another unit was rectified by the appellant without malicious intent, leading to no penalty imposition. Consequently, the Tribunal found no grounds for penalty imposition and disposed of the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>