<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1037 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349882</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order demanding duty, interest, and penalties in an appeal involving allegations of clandestine removal based on photocopies of invoices and shortages during investigation. The appellants disputed the authenticity of the invoices and absence of a panchnama, while the Revenue relied on search findings. The tribunal found the show cause notice lacked reliance on crucial documents, rendering the allegation unsustainable. Emphasizing the importance of specific documentation in such cases, the decision stresses the necessity of proper evidence and procedural adherence in tax matters for fair duty demands and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:04:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1037 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349882</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order demanding duty, interest, and penalties in an appeal involving allegations of clandestine removal based on photocopies of invoices and shortages during investigation. The appellants disputed the authenticity of the invoices and absence of a panchnama, while the Revenue relied on search findings. The tribunal found the show cause notice lacked reliance on crucial documents, rendering the allegation unsustainable. Emphasizing the importance of specific documentation in such cases, the decision stresses the necessity of proper evidence and procedural adherence in tax matters for fair duty demands and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>