<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1027 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349872</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the original adjudicating authority to verify the reversal or payment of Cenvat credit and re-adjudicate the matter within four months, providing necessary opportunities for personal hearing and submission of documents to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:03:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1027 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349872</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing the original adjudicating authority to verify the reversal or payment of Cenvat credit and re-adjudicate the matter within four months, providing necessary opportunities for personal hearing and submission of documents to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>