<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1026 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349871</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the confiscation of 3990 kgs of tobacco seized from a manufacturing unit as it was deemed fit for human consumption and not eligible for certain exemptions. Duty demand on 1335000 pouches cleared from another factory was upheld, along with penalties and personal penalty on one proprietor, based on admissions of clandestine clearance. The tribunal concluded that the seized goods did not qualify for specific exemptions and classified the seized goods as chewing tobacco, leading to duty liabilities and penalties being upheld. Penalties imposed by lower authorities, including personal penalty, were upheld, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:03:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1026 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349871</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the confiscation of 3990 kgs of tobacco seized from a manufacturing unit as it was deemed fit for human consumption and not eligible for certain exemptions. Duty demand on 1335000 pouches cleared from another factory was upheld, along with penalties and personal penalty on one proprietor, based on admissions of clandestine clearance. The tribunal concluded that the seized goods did not qualify for specific exemptions and classified the seized goods as chewing tobacco, leading to duty liabilities and penalties being upheld. Penalties imposed by lower authorities, including personal penalty, were upheld, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>